Sunday, October 31, 2010

Week 6 Seminar Paper

I did enjoy the chapter and although it was very difficult to understand there were particular moments which I found very funny like when several women came forward claiming that Bloom had in appropriately written to them and after the many women had spoken the first and only thing Bloom could say was “I love the danger!”

I think this shows how Bloom’s character is similar to Freud’s idea of the ID, his lust for women seems to be uncontrollable, he shows his affection through photos and gestures and he is constantly seeking danger and sexual pleasure despite the fact that he’s married. The ID’s animal nature also comes across when he wishes to be ‘horsewhipped’. He does not appear to have a Super Ego or Ego as he rarely does anything right within the society he’s living in and I don’t think that James Joyce’s writing has a particular ‘Ego’ either, there seems to be no reality and a lack of structure with constantly changing scenes and clothing.

The way Bloom’s character is shown would be approved by Reich, he thought that we should have sex all the time and this would make us free however by what happens in the book such as Bloom going to court it sides with Freud showing that being so ‘free’ is dangerous for us.

I believe that there is a use of phallic symbols in the writing, both for the audience to see and for Bloom’s character. For example “I took the splinter out of this hand, carefully, slowly...” could be seen as Bloom making the action of removing the splinter sexual towards Mrs Breen” and (Tenderly, as he slips on her finger a ruby ring)” this is aimed more towards the reader, giving them an image in their head which Freud believes the ID would recognise as being sexual.

When in court J.J. O’Molloy defends Bloom saying “the young person was treated by defendant as if she were his very own daughter” and later says “my client would be the last man in the world to do anything ungentlemanly which injured modesty...”
The first comment to a modern reader seems very wrong, just like Freud’s Oedipus complex – it is difficult to understand why anyone would wish to sleep with their father! Where Joyce writes “my client would be the last man in the world to do anything ungentlemanly which injured modesty...” it makes me think that perhaps Joyce agrees with Freud’s ideas by suggesting that sleeping with your daughter is not ungentlemanly.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Week 5 Thursday 28th October.

Freud.

We live in a Freudian world whether we like it or not. Everyday people use phrases in conversations which come from Freud without even realising, his presence over the years has become more and more.

It's easy to say that Freud had some crazy ideas and theories although all very interesting.
He believed that problems of humanity could be solved with psychoanalysis, that our minds were not in control; he disagreed with Locke's idea that we were born with a clean slate and learnt as we grew. He thought that sex was a central motivator and was involved with every part of our lives, causing us to see phallic symbols. He went as far to say that architects would without realising create buildings which looked like penises.

His penis thinking went on to penis envy. He described this as when a young girl realises she does not have a penis she believes this is because she has been castrated due to something she has done. This results in her loving her father and rejecting her mother because she also has no penis due to castration.

He thought that our "self love" was a barrier to science. It barred the idea that the Earth wasn't the centre of the universe, Darwin's theory of evolution and the idea that the conscious brain is not in charge.

Freud divided the mind into three parts which were all in deadly conflict.
  1. ID (unconscious)
    this part is incapable of language, only communicating with symbols. For example when we see a banana our ID is thinking 'penis'. We have this from when we are born, its our animal/instinct part of ourselves and operates on pleasure.
  2. EGO (self, conscious)
    this part is aware of reality.
  3. SUPER EGO
    this is the 'policeman in our head' which keeps us civilised and abiding by the rules of parents and society.

Freud thought that all of our problems begin during childhood and if they were not sorted out at the time then we would become stuck. According to Freud there are five stages of development:

  1. Oral Stage
    involves the mouth. He thought that premature weaning would create a problem like smoking or eating too much.
  2. Anal
    if problems occurred here we would become compulsive (this is an example of the words used in conversation linking to Freud.)
  3. Phallic Phase
    being obsessive with the penis and wanting a sexual relationship with your mother. The Oedipus Complex links with this, its when there is a desire to sleep with your mother and kill your father, but there is a danger as your father is bigger and stronger than you so you're worried he will castrate you. Once you learn to back off the issue is resolved.
  4. Latency
    sex becomes UN important until puberty
  5. Gentiles
    obsessed with!

Freud said that the constant battle between the Super Ego, Ego and ID caused repression and made us ill. He had defence mechanisms for this:

Sublimination - diverting the sexual energy into something else such as sport or art.
Displacement - when you're angry with something, move the anger to something else.
Projection - sending feelings onto others, for example you're at a bus stop after a night out and a drunk man says 'what are you looking at?' you reply 'nothing' but the man persists and asks if you're looking for a fight.

Rationalisation - hitting children for their own good.

Freud said that;

  • Psychoanalysis tries to bring out things that you're hiding with in yourself, this is done by hypnosis. When discussing things with free association the Super Ego relaxes and you express things you never even knew you were troubled with.
    Within dreams where the Super Ego is asleep the ID communicates with us. We can never escape the ID, sex and aggression can only be controlled.
  • As a society we want to be dominated and there is a fear that no one is in control. We are craving for a parent figure now that God is dead!
  • When in a crowd we give our sexual feelings to the leader and all our aggressive feelings are used away from the crowd - Nazi?

Scientists attacked Freud claiming that all of his claims were too vague and never really science. There is no proof that psychoanalysis works. Now there is no need for Freud as we have Nero science like MRI scans which can measure activity of the brain.

There are three areas of the brain

  1. Reptilian Brain
    this keeps the body functioning. It could be compared to Freud's Sub Conscious - we can't control what it tells us to think/do. For example breathing.
  2. Limbic System
    controls our emotions. Linked to Freud's ID perhaps?
  3. Neo Cortex
    the most complex, controlling language and planning. Freud's conscious?

Reich.
Once a follower of Freud's but then he didn't believe that his methods were effective. He thought that people were generally good, it was society which forced and suppressed us - making us ill and dangerous. He thought that our underlying energy was sex, more orgasms meant happiness.

Basically Freud wanted us to keep our feelings in as they were very dangerous whereas Reich wanted us to let it all hang out! Having sex whenever and where ever we could makes us free.

Wow. What a lecture.

THINGS I LOVE. Knitwear.

There's nothing I like better than to put on a cosy winter jumper and sit down with a hot chocolate and Elle.
Luckily for me chunky knitwear is very desirable this season! One of my favourites is this all in one suit from Dolce and Gabbana.



I recently brought two new jumpers, both from River Island. They've got some really nice knitwear at the moment.


The blue one looks really cool wth leggings and boots. I like to wear the cream one with jeans and Converses.
YAY
! for winter.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Week 4 Thursday 20th October.

Frederick Nietzsche - Thus Spoke Zarathustra

We started the seminar today by asking what Nietzsche meant by 'GOD IS DEAD'.
I questioned whether he was trying to get on the 'right side' of people - he wanted them to follow his ideas but rather than just deny God which could create barriers between him and other people, he claimed that God had died.
Then we discussed that he did not mean it literally but as an idea. The idea of God is dead.
This is problematic as the majority of people lived their lives by God. Therefor if God is dead they have nothing to live their lives by so they loose all their morals.

Perhaps this is what Neitzsche wanted though, as his idea of an Overman was someone that had overcome himself...he obeys the laws he gives himself (no need for a God).

We tried to understand the Overman by looking at a tightrope situation. At one end of the rope is animals and at the other is the Overman, to get to the other side of the tightrope you must overcome life.
We linked this to Buddhism and their idea of Nirvana. According to Buddhists when you die you will be re-incarnated as an animal and what type of animal depends on how well you have lived your life. The highest aim of a Buddhist is to reach Nirvana, this is a state of nothing and ends the cycle of re-incarnation. It can only be obtained when nothing is desired.
This is similar to the Overman in that by overcoming life they need to 'forget' real life and be above everything else in the world.

I did enjoy the book but find it difficult to get my head around everything!

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Week 3 Thursday 14th October.

Today's lecture was on Modernism. Lets just say I have learnt that it's a confusing subject but in the words of Chris Horrie "it's okay to be confused" so I guess I'm not close to failing yet!

We began talking about Mozart and other modern composers and how their music reflected the modern times. The different sections of the music are like the architecture for example. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hJf4ZffkoI

The Modernist movement believes in:

  • relativity, that there are no absolutes
  • everything is made of nothing!
  • de-centered universe - no middle
  • physco analysis
Thomas Kuhn wrote The Structure of Scientific Revolutions which is an analysis of the history of science.

Frederick Nietzsche, a 19th century German philosopher is an important person to journalists as he was fantastic at creating shocking 'headlines' such as 'GOD IS DEAD' and 'MANKIND IS A THING THAT MUST BE OVERCOME'. He believed in individualism, was against democracy and did not like women as they brought life...

Dorothy Parker was an American poet and satirist.

Apologies that these notes make little sense, I am right now a little confused myself. I will come back to them later to try and make actual English sentences out of them.

Forgetful With Young Age?

It is normally said that forgetfulness comes with old age, but I am starting to doubt that idea.
I'm only 19 so still very young (not old in the slightest!) but occasionally my thoughts will just disappear out of my head never to return again.

For example last week I had thought of something which I wanted to write a blog about but within minutes it was gone. *Poof*. Even now I cannot remember what it was...but it led me to write this blog so not all is lost.

Sometimes I will be watching a TV programme and during the ad break I have forgotten for the life of me what I was even watching. So it can't of been that interesting anyway.

Lack of sleep and being stressed can cause younger people to become forgetful according to
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/498957/reasons_you_may_be_forgetful_at_a_young.html?cat=5
I suppose this does make sense.

On a serious note the idea of loosing my memory does scare me, especially as my Grandmother is loosing hers. It would be terrible not to be able to remember the simplest of things like where I left the kettle or even forgetting who people are.

My mum works with the elderly, in particular people who suffer with Dementia and recently she went on a course in London where they were told that 1-2 units of wine a night is very very good for your memory. It's a shame I don't like wine.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Week 2 Thursday 7th October.

Seminar
Tabloid Nation part one. Those Horrible Harmsworths

Alfred Harmsworth was born into an educated family in 1865, he was the creator of the original Daily Mail.
He advertised it as 'a penny paper for half-a-penny', 'the busy mans paper'. He wanted to capture audiences with simplicity, he said "they have no interest in society, but want anything which is interesting and simple."
It sold 397,215 copies on its first day of publication.
Harmsworth had a skill of thinking up clever competitions and creating cash prizes which were basically un-winnable but they attracted 700,000 entries which sent circulation into the roof.

The seminar began by discussing the comparisons between Alfred Harmsworth and William Randolf Hearst.
  • Both men were politically minded
  • They were clever minded about how to present their news papers - bold headlines, pictures
  • They had business minds. They knew what stories would sell papers - war, crime, sex, royals
  • Circulation was very important
Kennedy Jones, also known as KJ, was the day-to-day editor or The Daily Mail. Described as 'an intelligent but course man with no charm or manner or expression' he had previously worked at The Journal which was run by Hearst and was the veteran for "yellow press".

Alfred Harmsworth who was known as The Chief or Northcliffe introduced a women's section into the paper which was so successful that he produced an entirely new daily paper called The Daily Mirror which was aimed solely at women and was the first of its kind.
Kennedy Jones was put in charge although the paper failed.

Hannen Swaffer, the Pope of Fleet Street, rescued the paper by re-launching it as a 'picture paper' calling it 'The Illustrated Daily Mirror". The paper was then such a success that it was read my women and men and was 'something to look at on their way to work'.

I believe that a difference between Harmsworth and Hearst is that while both men desired top stories, Harmsworth was more concerned with where he could get in society. An example of this is how he saw himself as a potential kingmaker, using the opinions-forming power of his newspapers to pull strings behind the scenes.

During the First World War the Daily Mirror had a fantastic reputation. It had the highest sale of any daily newspaper and was known as the forces paper. It was delivered to the trenches giving the men an escape from war; 'a slice of life' back home.

Friday, October 1, 2010

THINGS I LOVE. Winter Boots.

For the past two years my heart has been with UGG Boots, but with each costing £150 and the fact that I walk like an idiot so I ruin them by the end of the season...I have decided to invest in a different type of boot.

After a lot of searching I came across these



They're by Blowfish but can be bought from Schuh or Next online. For £70 I think they're great.
They'd look great with a thick winter knit, skirt and tights.